We manage energy project development, environmental permitting, remediation and compliance, insustrial hygiene, health & safety, auditing, environmental management, government relations. We solve your problems in all of these areas. We move quickly and dig deeply to reach your goals. We work wherever you are.
How can SMG help you?
SMG POV
In a decision on March 24th, the Ohio Supreme Court effectively declared that the Ohio EPA cannot enforce certain limitations found in many Ohio NPDES permits. The ruling in the Fairfield County v. Nally case invalidated NPDES permit discharge limits that were established due to Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) in adjacent streams. The Court decided that over 1,700 TMDL restrictions on waterways throughout the state must be formally promulgated, requiring public comment. Since the Ohio EPA did not seek public comment periods for these TMDLs, the Court effectively invalidated discharge limitations for Ohio NPDES permits that were derived from these TMDL waterway allocations.
This decision creates significant uncertainty for Ohio NPDES permittees who must review their own NPDES permits to see if any of their discharge limitations were established to meet a TMDL. Many TMDLs are focused on limiting bacteria, nutrients, or metals in waterways, so NPDES limits on nitrates, E. coli, and mercury are affected. If the limits themselves are invalidated, fees and penalties paid by the permittees for exceeding TMDL derived parameters may also be reviewed. A map of watersheds that have implemented TMDLs can be found below.
If you think your permit may be affected by this ruling and you have questions, you can contact me at josiahf@smithmanage.com.
Sources:
- http://www.ohioenvironmentallawblog.com/2015/03/articles/water/ohio-supreme-court-invalidates-nearly-two-thousand-water-quality-determinations/print.html
- http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=35672ab6-1bee-4aa2-88f7-213ee7500de3
- http://epa.ohio.gov/dsw/tmdl/OhioIntegratedReport.aspx#123126631-summary-of-2012-report
FEATURED PROJECT
PROBLEM
A local company engaged in manufacturing imported a small amount of a chemical substance defined under TSCA. Faced with a potential EPA enforcement action with penalties assessed for noncompliance under TSCA of up to $32,500 per day per violation, the company called SMG for help.
SMG'S APPROACH
SMG analyzed the company’s current TSCA procedures and assisted the company in developing a proactive, cost-effective compliance procedure. SMG also facilitated a training program to educate employees about TSCA.
MG worked with the company to develop mechanisms that assured adherence with the policies that were being implemented for compliance. Procedures to promptly correct any potential violations and prevent future violations were also put into place.
RESULTS
SMG was able to show that the company complied with the relevant TSCA regulations and was improving their TSCA policies and procedures to assure that future issues were less likely to occur. The company was not subjected to the proposed penalties and now has mechanisms in place to maintain TSCA compliance.